To:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc:
Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, tech@nic.fr
From:
Olivier Guillard / AFNIC <Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr>
Date:
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 10:10:52 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<v03130313b6fa59da54db@[10.33.10.145]>; from lewis@tislabs.com on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:00:28PM -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject:
Re: Nameserver MUST HAVE IP
Edward, Technically speacking, I agree with Mats, So I disagree with the document direction. Formally speaking, I agree with you, So I disagree with this: Name servers registered within the registry's authoritative TLDs SHOULD be registered with a valid IPv4 or IPv6 address. Olivier le mercredi 11 avril à 15 H 00 , Edward Lewis a écrit : > At 8:27 AM -0400 4/9/01, Mats Dufberg wrote: > >Name servers MUST be registered with valid IPv4 or IPv6 address when "glue > >record" is stricly needed for delegation of a domain from the TLD. The > >address MAY be removed when no longer needed for strict "glue record". > > Remember that our scope in this document is the set of requirements for a > suitable protocol. The latter sentence addresses the way in which a > registry handle the data, an issue certainly outside our scope. > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Edward Lewis NAI Labs > Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com > > Dilbert is an optimist. > > Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer. >