[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "'Peter Eisenhauer'" <eisenhauer@schlund.de>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 06:54:59 -0400
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: 3.4.9 [4]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter Eisenhauer [mailto:eisenhauer@schlund.de]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 5:09 AM
>To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
>Subject: 3.4.9 [4]
>
>
>
>3.4.9 [4]:
>"Requests to retrieve information describing a registered object
> MAY be granted by the registrar that currently sponsors the registered
> object."
>
>As far as I understand the (registry public) retrievel of object
information
>using the protocol then is handle by registrar policy?  Shouldn't it be
>possible also to the registry?
>
>Suggestion:
>
>"... MAY be granted by the registrar that currently sponsors the registered
> object or MAY be granted by registry policy."
>
>Or is this not neccessary because of 1-3 the registry MUST provide services
to
>retrieve information and therefore by definition is able to grant rights to
>retrieve information?

This particular wording was requested by Eric Brunner-Williams.  Eric, would
you care to clarify, please?

<Scott/>

Home | Date list | Subject list