To:
michaelm@netsol.com
Cc:
bmanning@isi.edu (Bill Manning), shollenbeck@verisign.com (Hollenbeck Scott), ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Date:
Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:04:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<20010312125149.A2702@bailey.dscga.com> from "Michael Mealling" at Mar 12, 2001 12:51:49 PM
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Unique handle generation
%>% I'm not sure I understand the point you're trying to make in the context of %>% admin repository changes over time. %>% %>% What happens to your example handle if the admin function is one day moved %>% from ARIN to some other administrative entity (call it !ARIN for the sake of %>% argument), but the person and prefix remain constant? Does the handle %>% remain WM110-ARIN, or must it change to WM110-!ARIN? %> %> The legecy composite WM110-ARIN remains %> If -I- chose to do business w/ !ARIN, then !ARIN may %> create the composite WM110-!ARIN. If !ARIN wishes %> to create the composite anyway, they -MUST- use my %> handle, WM110, not create something else.. like BM14 %> or WM73. % % So your personal handle is part of a globally unique space that all % registries have to coordinate to ensure uniqueness, right? % % -MM Unfortunately, yes. Just like the registry handles have be be globally unique. (It would be confusing to have two registries with the same handle... :) One must have globally unique space within each object type. -- --bill