To:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
From:
"Christopher Ambler" <cambler-ietf@iodesign.com>
Date:
Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:45:54 -0800
Reply-To:
"Christopher Ambler" <cambler-ietf@iodesign.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Unique handle generation
I do agree, and perhaps should have noted my statement as a leading question. Apologies. Christopher ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrik Fältström" <paf@cisco.com> To: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler-ietf@iodesign.com>; <ietf-provreg@cafax.se> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 1:22 AM Subject: Re: Unique handle generation > At 15.55 -0800 01-03-10, Christopher Ambler wrote: > >Same with name servers, then, if you mandate that there is one object > >per IP address? > > No. With this model you are redefining the DNS. > > A domain name object is refering to a nameserver object, and that > nameserver object have an IP-address as an attribute. If the > IP-address change of that nameserver (different operation from > nameserver for the domain changes) the reference in the domain name > object is not to be changed. > > paf >