To:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Christopher Ambler" <cambler-ietf@iodesign.com>
Date:
Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:55:52 -0800
Reply-To:
"Christopher Ambler" <cambler-ietf@iodesign.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Unique handle generation
Same with name servers, then, if you mandate that there is one object per IP address? Christopher ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick H Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com> To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Cc: <ietf-provreg@cafax.se> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 3:48 PM Subject: RE: Unique handle generation > > Scott, > > On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > > > OK, I see your point. In an earlier message you suggested some requirements > > for handles; let me try to capture those thoughts (and some mentioned by > > others) more precisely: > > > > 1. Every object MUST have an associated handle. > > Domain Name objects DO NOT need handles, as the FQDN uniquely identifies > the object. > > > -rick > > >