[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler-ietf@iodesign.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:55:52 -0800
Reply-To: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler-ietf@iodesign.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Unique handle generation

Same with name servers, then, if you mandate that there is one object
per IP address?

Christopher

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rick H Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc: <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: RE: Unique handle generation


> 
> Scott,
> 
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> 
> 
> > OK, I see your point.  In an earlier message you suggested some requirements
> > for handles; let me try to capture those thoughts (and some mentioned by
> > others) more precisely:
> >
> > 1. Every object MUST have an associated handle.
> 
> Domain Name objects DO NOT need handles, as the FQDN uniquely identifies
> the object.
> 
> 
> -rick
> 
> 
> 


Home | Date list | Subject list