To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Martin Oldfield <m@mail.tc>
Date:
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 16:52:59 +0000 (GMT)
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D75075F@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Unique handle generation
>>>>> "Scott" == Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com> writes: >> -----Original Message----- From: Martin Oldfield >> [mailto:m@mail.tc] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 11:33 AM To: >> Hollenbeck, Scott Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se Subject: RE: Unique >> handle generation Scott> [snip] >> For example, suppose you supplied the hint `Hollenbeck' to a >> registry which wanted local-parts to be lower-case, 12 >> characters long and to have a certain checksum: it would be >> simple for the registry to return a local-part of >> `hollenbeck34'. Scott> I'd be OK with that as well. It would be nice if the Scott> person whose identity is tied to the handle has some Scott> influence on the local part. Presumably though this would have to be through the registrar. Cheers, -- Martin Oldfield, AdamsNames Ltd.