[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>, Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: "Bason, Chris" <cbason@verisign.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:16:17 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: Interim meeting minutes

One comment about the Global Unique Handles:

I believe the minutes were stated correctly. 
I don't think we came to a general consensus 
that Global Unique Handles were a "Good Thing".

Chris Bason

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick H Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 9:41 PM
> To: Edward Lewis
> Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Subject: Re: Interim meeting minutes
> 
> 
> 
> I have a few comments about the minutes taken, they are inline.
> 
> -rick
> 
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Edward Lewis wrote:
> 
> 
> > Handle Issues
> > 	- ability to reference objects in other registries
> > 	  specifically: Contacts
> > 	- move to a more general approach
> > 	- a global namespace for object storage for each registry
> > 	- privacy issues were brought up.
> > 	- Decided that there is no reason NOT to use it (But 
> shouldn't be in
> >           this protocol - only the ability to do it should 
> be in the protocol)
> > 	- Still an open issue
> 
> I don't think we decided anything, as an interm meeting can't 
> decide. I
> believe we recomended that Global Unique handles would be a 
> Good Thing(tm)
> for the protocol to support.
> 
> >
> > Transport Issues (BEEP, parsing at client)
> >   - statement made that transport alternatives are needed to improve
> > 	  efficiency
> 
> we discussed ways that the current proposals could shorten 
> the amount of
> data transfered by establishing context oriented data in the session
> establishment phase of protocol negoation.
> 
> > Design Teams
> 
> > 	- Design teams work all through March
> > 	- Deadline - end of week (Feb 23) for design team formation (5-7
> > people)
> [snip]
> 
> I hope the chairs will announce these soon, with well defined 
> objectives.
> 
> 
> > Discussion of consummating the collution effort
> > 	- Having a "commercial Implmentors consortium
> > 	- Interoperability testing
> > 	- Load testing
> > 	- Rich Shockey volunteered to start Implementors group
> > 		* Email to rich.shockey@neustar.com to join mailing list
> 
> The list is at pri@ar.com, PRI stands from ProvReg 
> Implementors. alot of
> folks have already subscribed. To subscribe send a message 
> with the word
> "Subscribe" (without the quotes) to pri-request@ar.com
> 
> -rick
> 

Home | Date list | Subject list