To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Date:
Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:51:44 -0800
In-Reply-To:
<200102051607.f15G76n68805@nic-naa.net>; from Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:07:06AM -0500
Mail-Followup-To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: WG starting point - WG query
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:07:06AM -0500, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: [...] >> 1. Shall the working group take Scott's Requirements document and >> Scott's protocol specification is direct input, and then seek to refine them? > > Hum. Hum also. > > Or: > > > > 2. Shall the working group start from scratch and seek full > > development of Requirements and full development of a protocol > > specification, including possible choice among competing specifications? > > Non-hum. Non-hum, also. I hate to be a "me-too", but even if it turns out that there are significant changes to Scott's draft, we are still miles ahead to start from there. -- Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain