To:
budi@alliance.globalnetlink.com
CC:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Date:
Sat, 06 Jan 2001 00:42:06 +0100
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Definition of Registry
budi@alliance.globalnetlink.com wrote: > > On 5 Jan 01, at 14:06, Peter Mott wrote: > > > Perhaps I was not so clear. I am talking about the entity with power to > > change the data in the registry, not the entity that claims an intellectual > > property right to the data. > > Peter, > I still think that the user/registrant/registered entity > is the one that has the power to change the data in > the registry. (Through some kind of certificate.) > > However, she can delegate the right to a registrar. > ie. a registrar can change the data, on behalf of her. > It is easy to transfer authority/delegation from one > registrar to another registrar if she wishes. > Just revoke the certifiate and issue an new one. > > Maybe something like this? > > Registry > | > +--------+-----------+ ... > | | | > User/ registrar registrar > Registrant | | > +--+---+ > | | > User/ > Registrant > Budi, to our experience, registrars often have resellers, and, in some cases, they also have resellers. So, to use your diagram, it could look like Registry | +--------+-----------+ ... | | | User/ registrar registrar Registrant | | +--+---+ reseller | | | User/ +----+---+ Registrant | | User/ reseller Registrant | . . User/ Registrant So the question is whether one should introduce a generalized concept of a "chain of delegation", similar to the chain of authorities in digital certificates. regards, Klaus Malorny ___________________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 Dipl. Inf. Klaus Malorny 44227 Dortmund Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de Tel. +49 231 9703 0