To:
"Ietf-Provreg@Cafax. Se" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
From:
"Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
Date:
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:11:38 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Domain Name/Whois Data Element and Related Definitions
> Using the term SLD is difficult as sometimes what is registered is > not an second level domain, but instead a third level domain. True. ICANN made a small mistake when they put their various operating agreements with DOC/NSI/Registrars in place. Prior to that, "domain holder" and "registrant" were used somewhat interchangeably to describe the entity that held the domain. When ICANN started producing contracts, they defined a new term "SLD Holder" to mean the same thing. The problem was that people stopped using "domain holder" and started using the unwieldly newer terms. As such, the more understood and universally used term "domain holder" has largely been dropped from the vocabulary of domains. I think it's time that we bring it back ;) I'll annotate the next version to include a variant of the above. If anyone has any suggestions as to what the def'n of a "domain holder" should be, or rather, where the definition may be materially different from that of SLD Holder, please drop me a line. I'll start wordsmithing in the meantime... -rwr