To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
"'Alf.Hansen@uninett.no'" <Alf.Hansen@uninett.no>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@sidn.nl>
Date:
Thu, 04 Jan 2001 14:19:16 +0100
In-reply-to:
Your message of Thu, 04 Jan 2001 07:58:14 -0500. <DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D750424@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Defenition of Registry
OK, how about changing the definition from this: "Registry: An entity that provides back-end domain name registration services to registrars, managing a central repository of information for a given TLD. A registry is typically responsible for publication and distribution of TLD zone files used by the Domain Name System." to this: "Registry: An entity that provides back-end domain name registration services to registrars, managing a central repository of information for a given TLD. A registry is responsible for maintaining the integrity of repository content. A registry is also typically responsible for publication and distribution of TLD zone files used by the Domain Name System." I would leave it the way it was. This ``maintaining the intergrity of repository content'' is way too strong. How can the registry be resposible if the registrat is given wrong data? Are they still resposible? This will give lawyers new business opportunities. jaap