To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
"'Edward Lewis'" <lewis@tislabs.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date:
Tue, 2 Jan 2001 08:19:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D750401@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: State of Provreg
I propose that we just keep Ed as chair and not have a co-chair. Not that I have anything against Jaap, I don't. I think Ed will be fair and make sure all sides get represented. -rick On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > I'm curious about the need for a co-chair. I've seen only two list messages > that touch on the topic: one from Geva in which he suggested the idea, and > one from myself suggesting that if the need is for "balance" we already > appear to be progressing towards a balanced WG. Is a co-chair needed due to > projected work load or some "behind the scenes" concerns that haven't been > raised on the list? >