To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'Karl Auerbach'" <karl@CaveBear.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Richard Shockey <rshockey@ix.netcom.com>
Date:
Wed, 27 Dec 2000 13:36:27 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D7503D4@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Comments on overall direction
At 09:23 AM 12/27/2000 -0500, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >While I know of at least one company that would be thrilled to see >requirements for millions of domain name owners to become PKI-capable (or >even just the subset who wish to request transfers), I bet :-) > I have to echo the >point raised by Dave concerning deployment and adoption. I'm sure there are >domain name holders who would understand and welcome such developments, but >people aren't exactly falling over each other to install applications that >provide cryptographic services. > >I don't disagree that transactional integrity is essential, but we may have >different ideas on where that integrity service needs to be available or >applied. I believe that we have a far better chance to produce a widely >accepted protocol if we do our best to keep the protocol itself extremely >simple, and using a layered approach to add services that make sense in >particular operational environments. > >Scott Hollenbeck >VeriSign Global Registry Services I just want to echo my agreement with Scott here.. I think he and Dave are correct here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Senior Technical Industry Liaison NeuStar Inc. 1120 Vermont Avenue N.W., Suite 550, Washington DC. 20005 Voice: 202.533.2811, Cell : 314.503.0640, Fax: 815.333.1237 <mailto: rshockey@ix.netcom.com> or <mailto: rich.shockey@neustar.com> <http://www.neustar.com> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<