[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: Geva Patz <geva@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:48:36 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D7503B2@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>; from shollenbeck@verisign.com on Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 02:41:44PM -0500
Mail-Followup-To: "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject: Re: Expiration times [was Re: domreg BOF Meeting Minutes]

On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 02:41:44PM -0500, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> I can live with this.  How's this for work on the last sentence:
> 
> "The protocol MUST provide features to ensure that both registry and
> registrar have a mutual understanding of the validity period at the
> conclusion of a successful registration event."

Much better, thanks.

-- Geva

Home | Date list | Subject list