To:
Geva Patz <geva@bbn.com>, "'provreg List'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"J. William Semich" <bsemich@worldnames.net>
Date:
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:06:48 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<20001220095040.A37763@bruno.bbn.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: domreg BOF Meeting Minutes
Many (the majority?) of the ccTLDs require a minimum two-year initial registration period. Bill Semich .NU Domain At 09:50 AM 12/20/00 -0500, Geva Patz wrote: <snip> >Finally, we should probably go through the draft to make >sure that there aren't any small details in it that aren't >requirements per se. An example is this sort of thing: > >> The registration period for domain names MUST be measured in >> years, with a minimum period of one year and a maximum period >> defined by registry policy. > >Although this captures the current situation in most gTLDs (and >many ccTLDs) accurately, there's absolutely no reason to make >the minimum period of a year a high-level requirement. In fact, >there's a good reason not to: a protocol designed literally >to this requirement might include a validity counter with a >resolution in years, making it impossible for registries to >implement a policy with finer resolution. > >This is the only example that leapt out at me on my first few >passes, but a closer reading may yield other, similar situations >where current practice should not be reflected as a requirement. > >Geva Patz >geva@bbn.com > > Bill Semich President and Founder WorldNames, Inc. http://www.worldnames.net bsemich@worldnames.net