[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Geva Patz <geva@bbn.com>, "'provreg List'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "J. William Semich" <bsemich@worldnames.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:06:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20001220095040.A37763@bruno.bbn.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: domreg BOF Meeting Minutes

Many (the majority?) of the ccTLDs require a minimum two-year initial
registration period.

Bill Semich
.NU Domain

At 09:50 AM 12/20/00 -0500, Geva Patz wrote:

<snip>

>Finally, we should probably go through the draft to make
>sure that there aren't any small details in it that aren't
>requirements per se. An example is this sort of thing:
>
>>  The registration period for domain names MUST be measured in
>>  years, with a minimum period of one year and a maximum period
>>  defined by registry policy.
>
>Although this captures the current situation in most gTLDs (and
>many ccTLDs) accurately, there's absolutely no reason to make
>the minimum period of a year a high-level requirement. In fact,
>there's a good reason not to: a protocol designed literally
>to this requirement might include a validity counter with a
>resolution in years, making it impossible for registries to
>implement a policy with finer resolution.
>
>This is the only example that leapt out at me on my first few
>passes, but a closer reading may yield other, similar situations
>where current practice should not be reflected as a requirement.
>
>Geva Patz
>geva@bbn.com
>
>
Bill Semich
President and Founder
WorldNames, Inc.
http://www.worldnames.net
bsemich@worldnames.net

Home | Date list | Subject list