To:
John Schnizlein <jschnizl@cisco.com>
cc:
BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE <luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com>, <dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 08:15:12 +0300 (EEST)
In-Reply-To:
<4.3.2.7.2.20031006110018.02040908@wells.cisco.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: How IPv6 host gets DNS address
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, John Schnizlein wrote: > At 10:32 AM 10/6/2003, BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE wrote: > >... > >Some do think DNS resolver address is enough. I agree with that, when > >one trust its local network and/or when one just need simple Ip > >connectivity (see Pekka Savola example), DNS resolver addresses is the > >only "information" to add to stateless address autoconfiguration. There > >I have the feeling that DHCP-lite is still to complicated... > > What is complicated about DHCP-lite? [...] About 100+ pages of specification? -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.