To:
"'Bob Hinden'" <hinden@iprg.nokia.com>, "'Ralph Droms'" <rdroms@cisco.com>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Date:
Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:20:54 +0900
Importance:
Normal
In-reply-to:
<4.3.2.7.2.20030926101544.033583a8@mailhost.iprg.nokia.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: draft vienna minutes (sorry about the delay)
> The biggest technical difference I see between the DHCPv6 > (and DHCPv6 lite) > and RA approaches is that DHCPv6 is a two packet exchange for > each host vs. > the RA approach where a RA message can be multicast to all > hosts on the link. In addition, mobile node (especially WLAN) prefer RA option to DHCP from ISP experiences because of below reasons 1) Delay of DHCP request/reply Relay 2) Risk of centralized DHCP server (fault, failure and etc.) Daniel #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.