To:
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc:
John Schnizlein <jschnizl@cisco.com>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
Bob Hinden <hinden@iprg.nokia.com>
Date:
Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:29:40 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0309260733480.20180-100000@netcore.fi>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: How IPv6 host gets DNS address
Pekka, > > My impression is different: The rough consensus is to just use DHCPv6 > > as the protocol - either the "light" stateless subset in the router, > > or the statefull server. There seems to be a small but vocal set of > > people who want to invent something new rather than use the v6 variant > > of the dynamic host configuration protocol that is known to work. > >Well, as it is, it is up to the chairs (by RFC2418) to decide what the >consensus is. > >Currently, at least, I don't agree with this characterization of rough >consensus. Likewise. Bob #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.