To:
John Schnizlein <jschnizl@cisco.com>
Cc:
Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>
Date:
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 23:58:42 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<4.3.2.7.2.20030925134613.020cae00@wells.cisco.com>
Mail-Followup-To:
John Schnizlein <jschnizl@cisco.com>,Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, dnsop@cafax.se
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Vim/Mutt/Linux
Subject:
Re: How IPv6 host gets DNS address
[On 25 Sep, @19:53, John wrote in "How IPv6 host gets DNS address ..."] > At 01:17 PM 9/25/2003, Tim Chown wrote: > Re: draft vienna minutes (sorry about the delay) > >So this is a reasnoably fair reflection of the lack of concensus on RA vs > >DHCP for DNS resolver discovery in Vienna. > > My impression is different: The rough consensus is to just use DHCPv6 > as the protocol - either the "light" stateless subset in the router, > or the statefull server. There seems to be a small but vocal set of > people who want to invent something new rather than use the v6 variant > of the dynamic host configuration protocol that is known to work. This was also my impression, grtz Miek #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.