Re: Policy of IPv6 DNS Discovery

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> The reason why this topic was moved from the IPv6 WG to the DNSOP WG
> was to force a real discussion of requirements before proposing
> solutions.  In particular, we're required to answer the question which
> the IPv6 WG declined to ask: given DHCPv6 (including DHCPv6-lite),
> what real need is there for further work in this space?  This
> discussion is finally taking place on the DNSOP mailing list, albiet
> in fits and starts.  Discussion of new protocol extensions (such as
> your draft) will be in scope (for some WG, probably not DNSOP) if and
> only if this discussion concludes that there's a gap between real
> requirements and existing protocols.

<ad hat>

this is indeed what i thought was/is happening

randy

#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.