To:
John Schnizlein <jschnizl@cisco.com>
CC:
Jaehoon Paul Jeong <paul@etri.re.kr>, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date:
Mon, 4 Aug 2003 21:45:29 +0859 ()
In-Reply-To:
<4.3.2.7.2.20030804070642.020893d8@wells.cisco.com> from John Schnizleinat "Aug 4, 2003 07:22:13 am"
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Policy of IPv6 DNS Discovery
John; > At 01:35 AM 8/4/2003, Jaehoon Paul Jeong wrote: > >I think, I did my best to appeal the necessity of RA-based DNS Discovery, > >although I could not express my opinions well enough because of the limitation of Non-English speaker. > > Your interest is clear, And it is also clear that his case does not need RA-based DNS discovery, as was pointed by two of us. In mobile case, mobile hosts need constant DNS service. It is NOT acceptable that the mobile hosts try to find DNS server at foreign environment sometime successfully and sometimes not that DNS service MUST be bundled and share fate with HA service, which should be configured simultaneously. > and those of us who understand only English > appreciate your extra effort in making it clear in a language other > than your first. He should also appreciate my extra effort. > Since there is a protocol (DCHPv6) which can provide the necessary > information for hosts, and since the "heavy-weight" concerns attributed > to that protocol have been shown invalid (existence proof: DHPCv6-light), > justification for developing a new protocol (or extension of RA) must meet > the burden identified in Architectural Principle 3.2 ND performs functionality already provided by ARP, DHCP and routing protocols that it should disapper. For example, DHCP collocated on routers is the mechanism to provide address prefixes for autoconfiguration of addresses. Masataka Ohta #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.