To:
Bob Hinden <hinden@iprg.nokia.com>
CC:
Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Doug Barton <DougB@dougbarton.net>
Date:
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:42:27 -0700
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
Subject:
Re: Stepping back on the DNS discovery discussion
Bob Hinden wrote: > Tim, > >> There was certainly a significant hum in this direction in the meeting. >> Both DNS Lite and RA discovery methods can exist; each has an application >> domain/scope. > > > I agree with this view. I think we should proceed with the RA approach > for learning the address(es) of the recursive DNS servers and optionally > a search list. This is exactly the kind of feature creep that bothers me about the RA dns discovery approach. The proponents' argument boils down to, "Well we have 3 things, so it'll be easy to add a 4th (resolver[s])." The logical progression of that is that if you're going to add the 4th anyway, it's not really useful without the 5th (search list), and now I've got everything else I need, can't I please have the 6th (widget) too? Please? Pretty please? Speaking as a client system implementor, I can almost see situations where the RA approach for stateless autoconfiguration of IP mask and gateway would be useful. However, by feature creeping RA you're basically forcing me to implement two autoconfiguration methods for every client, because if RA becomes "just robust enough" there are going to be networks where there is no dhcp. Speaking as a resolving name server/dhcp configurator, I can easily imagine situations where the routers are pointed at one set of resolving name servers, and I want the clients pointed at a different set. This increases the complexity of the RA approach one notch already, and I'm just shooting from the hip here. I'm sure others can think of more complex problems. The dhcp(lite) mechanism already exists to do everything that the RA DNS discovery could ever imagine doing, plus lots more. It's a scalable solution with a known implementation path. I fear that further muddying of the water is detrimental to both the long term goal of robust IPv6 networking, and the short term goal of encouraging IPv6 adoption and deployment. Doug -- Angel: We need you to distract the vampires. Buffy: Right. Xander: What are you going to do? Buffy: I'm going to kill them all. (Walking away) That oughta distract them. "When She Was Bad" - Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Season Two Episode One #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.