To:
jasko@fakat.com
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
matthew.ford@bt.com
Date:
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:07:12 +0100
content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Re: Stepping back on the DNS discovery discussion
To replicate only the functionality of the RA/ND approach, the DHCP client required is very minimal indeed. Mat. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jasminko Mulahusic [mailto:jasko@fakat.com] > Sent: 16 July 2003 10:41 > To: Ford,M,Mat,XGH5 FORDM5 R > Cc: dnsop@cafax.se > Subject: RE: Re: Stepping back on the DNS discovery discussion > > > > > On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 matthew.ford@bt.com wrote: > > > the RA/ND approach is 'right'. It might help if you could > say why you > > believe that, and specifically why you believe that using > RA/ND is better > > than using DHCP. > > > > one argument that i have heard is that you don't have to have > a running > dhcp client on you device. > > jasminko > > > Mat. > > > #------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > > # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>. > > > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.