To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
kent@songbird.com
Date:
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:02:36 -0700
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<20030615153049.BFCC51396B@sa.vix.com>
Mail-Followup-To:
dnsop@cafax.se
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject:
Re: so how about that response size draft?
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 03:30:49PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> akira and i both hoped that it would be adopted as a DNSOP work item
> but the discussion of this in san francisco was inconclusive and there
> has been no subsequent discussion here on the mailing list.
>
> a draft cutoff date looms. should this i-d have "-dnsop-" in its name?
>
> note that we also showed this draft to some of icann/iana's people and
> they were happy to see it. therefore it may have some applicability to
> somebody. should DNSOP "adopt" it and do the fold-spindle-mutilate thing?
As one of the icann/iana people who found the draft extremely helpful,
and would like to cite it, by all means...
Kent
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
Manager of Technical Operations, ICANN lonesome."
crispin@icann.org,kent@songbird.com -- Mark Twain
p: +1 310 823 9358 f: +1 310 823 8649
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.