To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Kevin Darcy <kcd@daimlerchrysler.com>
Date:
Mon, 14 Apr 2003 13:23:24 -0400
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-04.txt
Brad Knowles wrote: > At 6:13 PM -0400 2003/04/10, Kevin Darcy wrote: > > > The draft is a bad draft. > > Then propose something better. Or at least propose improvements > to what's there. "Accept what is proposed or propose something yourself" is a false dilemma As a third alternative, we could do *nothing* and let reverse DNS wither away of its own accord, as it becomes less and less reliable over time. If we want to publish a document that says *only* to not rely on reverse DNS, I'd be OK with that. It's the "X is bad, but still keep on supporting X", schizoid part that I'm having a problem with... - Kevin #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.