To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
Date:
Sat, 12 Apr 2003 22:56:55 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<200304081410.h38EAVM16474@boreas.isi.edu>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
were there global name space oriented work?
On 16:10 08/04/03, Bill Manning said: > that is correct. if you want to explore native IPv6 resolution, you > should look at the testbed. outputs from the testbed are used as input > to the ICANN process so tht eventually we might see IPv6 support in the > root. In working on the dot-root test bed concept and on my attempt of a global name space draft, I came across perspectives supporting the different adressing schemes: internet, telephone, domotic, radio/TV frequencies (channels), postal adressing/EDI, Teletex, telematics as a single homogenous continuity. With a DNS consistent semantic (but based on user centric and on multilateral concepts as well as on the domain hierarchy). It seems it is not so far from the initial "internetting" 1973 specs, 1978 intl file organization, 83/86 namespace/X121 support, SMS usage, user demands. Obviously the name server system would use a quite different structure (BTW free from DoS) but Bind would still work the same. Yet security/stability could be simplified, increased and/or differently adressed? Nothing formalized yet and by far. But I would be interested to know if some works are/were carried into such directions? I was told there was an attempt by the DoD to integrate X121 at a given time? Were could I get an ENUM situation brief? Thanks to anyone with suggestions/comments. jfc >% Thanks Bill, Paul, >% >% I have another question. >% >% Some gTLDs and ccTLDs have IPv6 DNS now. While current root zone >% doesn't contain IPv6 referral (glue for 'AAAA') for these TLD name servers. >% >% Does this mean TLD IPv6 servers will not be asked in current DNS resolution, >% until their IPv6 addresses are added in root zone file? >% Thanks! >% >% BRs >% >% Zhang Hong >% >% ----- Original Message ----- >% From: "Bill Manning" <bmanning@ISI.EDU> >% To: <zhangh@cnnic.net.cn> >% Cc: <dnsop@cafax.se> >% Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 3:00 PM >% Subject: Re: Are there any ipv6 root servers? >% >% >% > % Hello, >% > % >% > % Are there any root servers that have ipv6 address and support ipv6 DNS? >% > % I heard that f-root and h-root have supported ipv6, but not sure. >% > % Thanks! >% > >% > several do. www.root-servers.org list addresses for f and h >% > others have IPv6 addresses but have chosen to not list them on >% > that site at this time. >% > >% > there is no formal support for IPv6 transport in the production >% > Internet at this time. It is possible to hand modify the hints >% > file to add these records. There is also a testbed that has native IPv6 >% > support (and has had for about 5 years), supports IDN lables and >% > DNSSEC signed zones. www.rs.net if you want to play >% > >% > >% > --bill >% > Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and >% > certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise). >% > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- >% > # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>. >% >% >% #---------------------------------------------------------------------- >% # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>. >% > > >-- >--bill > >Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and >certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise). > >#---------------------------------------------------------------------- ># To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>. > > > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.463 / Virus Database: 262 - Release Date: 17/03/03 #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.