To:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
cc:
Markus Stumpf <maex-lists-dns-ietf-dnsop@Space.Net>, <dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
Date:
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:06:44 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To:
<a05210624bab294ce4fd9@[10.0.1.2]>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: RR DNS and spam
Ah, you mean RFC 2476. 2476 is a _proposed_ standard. Since it hasn't moved since 1998, I think it is a _dead_ proposed standard. It is just another in a list of gratuitous changes that are shown by experience to be a waste of time and effort, as their proponents tilt at windmills trying to invent a protocol which can't be subjected to abuse and will prevent human behavior. So, I guess a statement has been demonstrated to be false, but it wasn't mine. --Dean On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 1:33 AM +0200 2003/04/04, Brad Knowles wrote: > > > This is a demonstrably false statement. The updated RFCs for > > Internet e-mail explicitly state that SMTP is a server-to-server > > protocol. If you want client-to-server, this would be the Mail > > Server Protocol (MSP). Right now, MSP looks a hell of a lot like > > SMTP, but they will diverge in the future. > > Sorry, I meant Message Submission Protocol. My bad. > > -- > Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be> > > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." > -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. > > GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ > !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) > tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++) > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.