To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Kevin Darcy <kcd@daimlerchrysler.com>
Date:
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:10:48 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<a05200f10baa50d3b89d0@[10.0.1.2]>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
Subject:
Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6.
Brad Knowles wrote: > At 12:48 PM -0500 2003/03/24, Kevin Darcy wrote: > >> And what, exactly, qualifies you to be the mouthpiece for this >> "silent constituency"? > > > Because I care, and I've got a skin thicker than you or anyone > else can penetrate. Whatever. I haven't even _tried_ to penetrate your skin. Did you think I had? >> If anyone has valid uses for reverse DNS, >> I say let them speak for themselves. > > > Which they (and others I was not aware of) have done. And all of those allegedly "legitimate" uses have turned out to be doable better -- more securely, more reliably, whatever -- in other ways besides end-node reverse DNS. Got anything new to add to the discussion? - Kevin #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.