[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, dnsop@cafax.se
From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel@sunet.se>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:34:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303161403540.21991-100000@netcore.fi>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: comments on -ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-issues-02



--On Sunday, March 16, 2003 14:05:56 +0200 Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
wrote:

> ==> one might note that in the case of reverse DNS lookup where a wildcard
> would be returned (the lazy/pragmatic ISP scenario), the result would be
> worthless anyway (ie. not useful as a security mechanism).  So this may be
> a protocol concern, but not really an operational one as far as I can see.

But handing out a reverse answer is sometimes a performance boost, keeping
old broken (but v6-aware) servers from timing out on a DNS reverse query. 
Sounds operational to me. 


-- 
Måns Nilsson            Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204         KTHNOC  MN1334-RIPE

We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.

PGP signature


Home | Date list | Subject list