To:
Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC:
Johan Ihren <johani@autonomica.se>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, dns op wg <dnsop@cafax.se>, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date:
Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:41:09 +0859 ()
In-Reply-To:
<20030317060620.GA24236@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> from Tim Chown at"Mar 17, 2003 06:06:20 am"
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: dns discovery for agenda? [Re: chairs and charter]
Tim; > I think that, > for example, advertising DNS by RA's in IPv6 offers a veru useful "missing > piece" in the stateless autoconfiguration puzzle. No, not at all. > I have no objection to it > as *a* method, but in the scenario of my home network I'd be quite happy > to run without statelessly configuring clients needing to use DHCP to get > the DNS info. The issue is merely that "stateless" approach is hopeless only to cause a lot of problems when its application is seriously considered. It is a problem of IPng group to remove "stateless" approach from IPv6 specification. Masataka Ohta #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.