[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: ple@graduate.kmitl.ac.th, paul@etri.re.kr
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se, mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com, khj@etri.re.kr
From: paul@etri.re.kr
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 09:31:31 +0900
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: [mobile-ip] MobileIPv6 VS DNS

Title: Re: [mobile-ip] MobileIPv6 VS DNS

Hi, Warodom.

I'll answer your question as inline.



From: Warodom Werapun[ple@graduate.kmitl.ac.th]
To: Jaehoon Jeong
Sent: Re: [mobile-ip] MobileIPv6 VS DNS
Date: 2003/03/15 Sat 01:43

         I thought, we could use DHCPv6 [if it has] do same processing with
your draft-propose,are we?
==> yes, you're right.
How about performance of use DHPCv6 VS your draft?
==> I think my solution is better and more suitable to HMIPv6 in the respect of the resolution time.
==> If we use DHCPv6, our mobile nodes should send DHCP request message to get the information
==> of recursive DNS server. But when we use my solution, we need not to send a request message,
==> because our mobile nodes get MAP option message with recursive DNS server's address in a new MAP domain.

==> Jaehoon

- Warodom
>[mobile-ip] MobileIPv6 VS DNSHello, I am the author of this draft.
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jeong-hmipv6-dns-optimization-00.txt
>(Title : The Autoconfiguration of Recursive DNS Server and
> the Optimization of DNS Name Resolution in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6)
>This draft is one of RA-based DNS discovery solutions.
>
>  
>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Warodom Werapun
>>To: mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com
>>Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 7:19 PM
>>Subject: [mobile-ip] MobileIPv6 VS DNS
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Following this link:
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jeong-hmipv6-dns-optimization-00.txt
>>When mobile node move, we only map to new DNS server.
>>    
>>
>
>  When mobile node moves into another MAP domain in hierarchical mobile IPv6 network,
>  it needs to find a new recursive DNS server  for the optimization of DNS resolution process
>  in the respect of name resolution time.
>
>  
>
>>We can reach mobile node in new location by using name in DNS.
>>    
>>
>
>  Yes, your're right. But when a mobile node tries to connect to an Internet service, such as web server,
>  first of all, it should resolve the service's DNS name into IP address.
>  In current DNS operation, the mobile node uses a fixed recursive DNS server normally placed in its home network.
>  If the mobile node can find a new recursive DNS server in the visited network,
>  it can use the new one for DNS name resolution instead of the previous one.
>  In the result, the time for name resolution can be saved. This is the main object of this draft.
>  I think the idea of the draft can be applied to IPv6 or mobile IPv6 network as well as hierarchical mobile IPv6 network.

>
>  
>
>>So, we don't need to set up any Home agent, are we?
>>/Warodom
>>Ps: I'm so newbies in MIPv6.
>> Thank you for your reply.
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for your question.
>
>Regards,
>Jaehoon
>
>  
>


Home | Date list | Subject list