To:
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Date:
Sat, 22 Feb 2003 23:36:07 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<5.2.0.9.0.20030222174204.0241d9d0@mail.club-internet.fr>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Why one port?
At 5:53 PM +0100 2003/02/22, J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
> The interest is that these two DNS parallel systems would be
> asynchronously managed. So they could immediately permit to check
> the validity of a response in one by the other.
Not really. They will be separately managed, and therefore you
can be reasonably guaranteed that you will frequently get different
answers from the two different services. So, when they disagree (and
they frequently will), which is wrong?
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.