RE: dnssec discussion today at noon

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>]

> > 	This assumes perfect implementation of the cryptography and the 
> > manner in which cryptography is used (and the whole rest of the 
> > system).  Schneier teaches us that this is a highly unlikely 
> > situation to occur anywhere.
> 
> I'm teching you Schneier (whoever he is) is wrong, then.

I am not too sure that Bruce made quite the point originally stated,
and if he did make it one should take a look at some other statements
Bruce has been known to state before necessarily taking his word as
gospel.

In fact I would suspect that a more accurate representation of
Bruce's position would be 'think about the protocol, don't depend
on dogma, including dogma that you might find attributed to me.'


		Phill