To:
Rob Austein <sra+dnsop@hactrn.net>
cc:
<dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se>
Date:
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 03:21:35 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To:
<20020320200907.90F18183@thangorodrim.hactrn.net>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-v6-name-space-fragmentation-01.txt
On Mar 20, 2002, 14:09 (-0600) Rob Austein <sra+dnsop@hactrn.net> wrote: > Servers that are just in v6 land will start popping up when v4 > addresses get really hard to obtain. Clients stuck in v4 land will > whine to their ISPs, who will install translation boxes or will > upgrade the customer's software or whatever so that customer is now > on v6. I think we should devide the zones into a few categories: 1. The root zone 2. The TLD zones 3. Special zones such as in-addr.arpa, ip6.arpa, e164.arpa 4. Customer zones I think that we can say that it is a MUST that 1, 2 and 3 be served under at least one IPv4 connected namnserver until IPv4 is closed down as part of Internet. We should recommend that customers zones (4) be served under IPv4, but I think it is a misstake to think that customers can rely on free namesservers. Free nameserver service has limitations. Mats ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se> ----------------------------------------------------------------------