[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>, Robert Elz <kre@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From: David Terrell <dbt@meat.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 18:31:31 -0700
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200108081430.XAA04529@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>; from mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp on Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:30:43PM +0859
Reply-To: David Terrell <dbt@meat.net>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary

On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:30:43PM +0859, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> With end-to-end multihoming, it is possible that application/transport
> program periodically check DNS to be smoothly renumbered.

If you need this sort of feature set, you should probably be using
something like SCTP which has explicit layer 4 support for multiple
valid layer 3 addresses.

-- 
David Terrell            | "My question is, if a mime types, isn't 
dbt@meat.net             |  that kinda cheating?"
http://wwn.nebcorp.com/  |    - Jason Zych

Home | Date list | Subject list