To:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc:
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>, Andreas Gustafsson <Andreas.Gustafsson@nominum.com>, "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
gson@nominum.com (Andreas Gustafsson)
Date:
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 08:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<200108040715.QAA02195@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject:
Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda
Masataka Ohta writes: > > How? No-one is suggesting that these records be put in the cache. > > I have been suggesting that these records be put in a referral-local > cache content of which is not used for usual A query nor glue A of > other referral points. I think that's an excellent approach, and one that should be seriously considered when designing new resolver implementations. BIND 8 and 9 have the concept of a single, global cache too deeply ingrained to be changed at this point. -- Andreas Gustafsson, gson@nominum.com