To:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Miek Gieben <miekg@open.nlnetlabs.nl>
Date:
Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:51:23 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<v03130306b6dd2ed84037@[192.94.214.135]>; from lewis@tislabs.com on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:11:52AM -0500
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Questions on draft-ietf-dnsop-parent-sig-00.txt
> And the result being: > > deleg.subzone.test. SOA > SIG SOA by deleg > NS machine1 > NS machine2 > NS machine3 > SIG NS by deleg > KEY key bits #1 > SIG KEY by deleg > SIG KEY by subzone.test. > NXT deleg2.subzone.test. > SIG NXT by subzone.test. > NXT host.deleg > SIG NXT by deleg > > Perhaps there is no need to maintain the "SIG KEY by deleg" and this might > make it cleaner. i think you are right, in this case the "SIG KEY by deleg" does not have to be maintained. grtz Miek NLnet Labs