[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
From: "Marco d'Itri" <md@linux.it>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:35:05 +0100
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2147.981465400@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU>; from kre@munnari.OZ.AU on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 08:16:40PM +0700
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
Subject: Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior

On Feb 06, Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> wrote:

 >>From where did this startling variation on accepted practice arrive?
 >All servers, when queried, should either return an answer (doing the
 >recursive thing if they want to, and that was requested in the query)
 >or should return a referral to a better server to ask.   When no other
People are supposed to send queries to an authoritative server only for
the zones it's authoritative for.
Can you explain why the server should return a referral for other
queries? This is broken behaviour anyway, and not replying may dissuade
people using it as their own recursive name server (which it is not).

-- 
ciao,
Marco


Home | Date list | Subject list