[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: randy@psg.com (Randy Bush)
Cc: bmanning@isi.edu (Bill Manning), perry@wasabisystems.com (Perry E. Metzger), seamus@bit-net.com (Jim Bound), users@ipv6.org, dnsop@cafax.se (dns op wg), ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:58:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E14JETZ-0004sj-00@rip.psg.com> from "Randy Bush" at Jan 18, 2001 04:47:37 AM
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: IPv6 dns

% 
% > % an example of a worry is cache poisoning of an antique v4 bind.
% > % ----
% > % and there are thousands of vulnerable v4 binds still out there.
% > 
% > 	One might argue that we have only applied the carrot.
% > 	We still have broken/vulnerable code, some pushing
% > 	15 years w/o an upgrade. Perhaps its time to apply
% > 	a stick and let folks know that things will stop working
% > 	or won't be the same unless they upgrade. 
% 
% there are people who don't think it's prudent engineering to break the net
% to get people to do something.  silly things about technical and social
% responsibility now that the net has grown a bit bigger than boys and their
% toys.
% 
% of course there are folk with the opposite opinion.

	And these folks tend to win operational/engineering arguments,
	otherwise we'd still be running:
	
	RIP, NCP, BGPv1, BGPv2, BGPv3, 
	Sometimes, you've got to cut the cord.

% 
% randy
% 


-- 
--bill

Home | Date list | Subject list