[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
cc: randy@psg.com (Randy Bush), perry@wasabisystems.com (Perry E. Metzger), seamus@bit-net.com (Jim Bound), users@ipv6.org, dnsop@cafax.se (dns op wg), ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:38:06 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:14:09 PST." <200101181214.f0ICE9g24080@zed.isi.edu>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: IPv6 dns

See <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-unknown-rrs-00.txt>.

Donald

From:  Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Message-Id:  <200101181214.f0ICE9g24080@zed.isi.edu>
To:  randy@psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date:  Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:14:09 -0800 (PST)
Cc:  perry@wasabisystems.com (Perry E. Metzger), seamus@bit-net.com (Jim Bound),
            users@ipv6.org, dnsop@cafax.se (dns op wg),
            ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
In-Reply-To:  <E14J8j5-000JOh-00@rip.psg.com> from "Randy Bush" at Jan 17, 2001 10:39:15 PM

>% an example of a worry is cache poisoning of an antique v4 bind.
>% ----
>% and there are thousands of vulnerable v4 binds still out there.
>% 
>% randy
>% 
>
>	One might argue that we have only applied the carrot.
>	We still have broken/vulnerable code, some pushing
>	15 years w/o an upgrade. Perhaps its time to apply
>	a stick and let folks know that things will stop working
>	or won't be the same unless they upgrade. 
>	I note that we will have this problem regardless and more
>	esp. as we hit "unknown" RR types.  Zones won't load. 
>	Perhaps we should have dnsops worry about the deployment of
>	new types, be it RR or Class?
>
>-- 
>--bill

Home | Date list | Subject list