To:
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date:
Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:49:35 -0800
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Last Call: Root Name Server Operational Requirements to BCP
[ note cc:s narrowed to those assumed actually interested ] > 2.8 Servers MUST generate checksums when sending UDP datagrams and > MUST verify checksums when receiving UDP datagrams. > could perhaps be read as suggesting that a root server must discard a > UDP packet received without a checksum (checksum field set to 0), as in > such a packet the checksum cannot be verified. i suspect that was the intent. why respond to garbage? > I see no reason why a root server shouldn't process such requests, however > dumb some may consider sending such things. perls before swine? > So, I'd propose rewording that sentence to... > > 2.8 Servers MUST generate checksums when sending UDP datagrams and > MUST verify checksums when receiving UDP datagrams containing > a non-zero checksum. i can live with it. let's see what co-authors have to say. randy