To:
EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Date:
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:32:49 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<C70DCE33.3575A%jgould@verisign.com>
Mail-Followup-To:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>,EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Anyone working on 4310-bis?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:32:19AM -0400, James Gould wrote: > still behaves like a replace, which again is backward compatible. The only > difference is that all four elements need to be provided (keyTag, alg, > digestType, digest) with a rem, which I don¹t believe should be a big issue. > Does anyone see an issue with having to specify either the keyTag or all > four elements on a rem? Can you say why you prefer to use all four elements instead of just the digest? The digest actually is unique, so adding the other elements doesn't make it easier, I don't think, does it? A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se