To:
Patrick Mevzek <provreg@contact.dotandco.com>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date:
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:31:10 +0100
Authentication-Results:
sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-Reply-To:
<20091027201649.GF5590@home.patoche.org>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Anyone working on 4310-bis?
On 27 okt 2009, at 21.16, Patrick Mevzek wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> 2009-10-27 21:05
>> I have of late observed a couple possibly pointy corners in RFC 4310,
>> and Howard Eland just pointed out to me a pretty big operational
>> problem in it, so I am wondering whether anyone is working on updates
>> to it.
>
> I'm not specifically working on it, but I would advise anyone dealing
> with DNSSEC and EPP to have a look at what .CZ did and what .EU will
> do soon, as they both created other extensions to handle DNSSEC with
> EPP. Maybe other registries too. Sorry if you did that already.
>
> I'm not judging pro or in favor of any other extension,
> but I believe that having a look at the currently deployed EPP
> dealings with DNSSEC would be a good idea in light of future work on
> 4310.
We use epp and DNSSEC in .SE since a while back. What are the issues
you think?
Patrik
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se