To:
"Dan Maharry" <dan@mcd.coop>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:54:32 -0500
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
Acc7A6qJK3T0ip6kSxa0sYWCjD6F2AABEE7w
Thread-Topic:
[ietf-provreg] RFC3735 References to schemaLocation
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] RFC3735 References to schemaLocation
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se > [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se] On Behalf Of Dan Maharry > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 8:22 AM > To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: [ietf-provreg] RFC3735 References to schemaLocation > > Hello, > > RFC3730 - 3734 have all been edited to remove the use of the > schemaLocation attribute in EPP, and yet the example extensions in > RFC3735, section 2.3 still use them. Is this deliberate? Yes, because that document hasn't been updated. 3735 is an Informational document that I don't intend to update unless something really substantial comes up. schemaLocation isn't substantial. -Scott-