RE: [ietf-provreg] 3731bis Submitted

["Michael Young" <myoung@ca.afilias.info>]

Scott so far these changes look like they address the raised issues.

Thank you for the effort, its much appreciated. 


Michael Young 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se] On
Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:28 PM
To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: [ietf-provreg] 3731bis Submitted

I just sent the -00 version of 3731bis to the I-D administrator for
publication.  Here's the list of changes copied from Appendix A:

1.  Minor reformatting as a result of converting I-D source format
    from nroff to XML.

2.  Removed this text from Section 2.3:

    "With one exception, transform commands MUST be rejected when a
    pendingCreate, pendingDelete, pendingRenew, pendingTransfer, or
    pendingUpdate status is set.  The only exception is that a
    <transfer> command to approve, reject, or cancel a transfer MAY
    be processed while an object is in "pendingTransfer" status."

3.  Changed text in Section 3.2.1.4 from "At least one <domain:add>,
    <domain:rem>, or <domain:chg> element MUST be provided." to "At
    least one <domain:add>, <domain:rem>, or <domain:chg> element
    MUST be provided if the command is not being extended.  All of
    these elements MAY be omitted if an <update> extension is
    present.".

4.  Renumbered old section 3.2.6 to new section 3.3.

5.  Changed text in Section 3.3 (old Section 3.2.6) from this:

    "The server operator reviews the request offline, and informs the
    client of the outcome of the review by queuing a service message
    for retrieval via the <poll> command."

    to this:

    "The server operator reviews the request offline, and informs the
    client of the outcome of the review by either queuing a service
    message for retrieval via the <poll> command or by using an out-
    of-band mechanism to inform the client of the request."

6.  Updated EPP and XML references.

I need to make a change to 3732bis and 3733bis to deal with the same text as
described above in item #5, but I'll do that after giving people some time
to read the documents and check them again.

I believe this set of updates (3730bis - 3734bis) captures all of the
changes that the members of this mailing list have agreed to.  Please let me
know if something has been missed.

-Scott-