[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
cc: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>, Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, jaap@sidn.nl, brunner@nic-naa.net
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:37:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:47:49 EDT." <a05111b01bac4adfeeaf7@[192.149.252.108]>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] legal entity vs individual person

1. On the issue of when there was a consensus call, and for what.


http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-03/msg00104.html
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-03/msg00105.html
and
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-03/msg00128.html

OK. Thats done. That is consensus to specify a client-side operation.

However, this little dance has assumed a client-side operation.

You need to ask for consensus on the following:

please check one box, within the scope of a client-side <dnp> oerator,

	[] there is no such thing as "personal data" semantics
	[] there is such a thing as "personal data"semantics

That is what is the present issue, get consensus on it, and there is
nothing left in it to consider.

Eric

Home | Date list | Subject list