To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
Date:
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:50:28 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD60337077B@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] FYI: EPP implementation by the Polish registry
--On Monday, March 03, 2003 1:02 PM -0500 "Hollenbeck, Scott"
<shollenbeck@verisign.com> mentioned that:
> That being the case, my preference would be to put _all_ of the DNP syntax
> and semantics into an extension (where the problem can be addressed as a
> whole) while making the existing DCP element mandatory
We'd be happy with that as well.
regards,
-rwr
"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright
Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/