To:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>
Date:
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:22:27 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<5E42C1C85C5D064A947CF92FADE6D82E823F76@stntexch1.va.neustar.com>; from Hong.Liu@neustar.biz on Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:37:34PM -0500
Mail-Followup-To:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>,"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject:
Re: Handling of External Host Objects: Single vs. Multi Copy Solu tions (was: in the context of domain transfer)
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:37:34PM -0500, Liu, Hong wrote:
> (5) Partial updates.
[. . .]
> nameservers provided by Y are also external hosts. Then registrar R
> cannot just rename X's nameservers to Y's since A's domains are
> still using X's nameservers. So R has to update B's domains
> one-by-one.
I truly do not understand this objection. This is no different than
if B decides to change name servers using internal hosts, if someone
else is using the host. (Objection 6 seems to me to be the same:
it's just not a real objection. Yes, it's a pain to change the
nameservers of a large number of domains. There's a reason managers
of large networks avoid doing so.)
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110