To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'Stephane Bortzmeyer'" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date:
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:05:03 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<200210222111.g9MLBItE012136@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.3.28i
Subject:
Re: "private" Element Attribute
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:11:18PM -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > What problem are we trying to solve? > > a. Providing a mechanism for users to announce their preferences? > > b. Providing a mechanism for collectors to announce their practices? > > c. Providing a mechanism for the expression of applicable law? > > d. Providing a mechanism for policy expression which is capable of > test, hence enforcement? > > e. Other > > I was pretty sure we settled on (c), hence (b), and not on (a). I had a very different feeling. I thought we were trying to work mostly on a) and secondary on b) (BTW, c) is just a subpart of b). d) is just impossible.