To:
"Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>
cc:
wessorh@ar.com, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, brunner@nic-naa.net
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:04:00 -0400
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Wed, 21 Aug 2002 20:04:10 EDT." <B989A2BA.EFD3%jordyn@register.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: epp status
> ... allows us to > avoid making the server go insane when ... Still, isn't this a registry-private issue? and > Is there an assumption of auto-renewal within any of the EPP specs? If it exists, we should remove it. > ... There > may be some registries where the desired behavior at the end of the > registration period is auto-deletion ... Or whatever. There is a protocol state machine (or an approximation of one). There is a registry policy state machine (or ditto). There is no guarantee that one can't hang one with the other, just that we don't hang the first, and the second is registry-private. Eric